The Hidden Cost of Saudi Arabia’s Cross-Border Data Transfer Regulations – A Barrier to Innovation or a Necessary Safeguard?

As Saudi Arabia continues to advance its data protection frameworks, the new Data Transfer Regulations present a significant challenge for businesses and an opportunity for Saudi Arabia to lead in data sovereignty within the Red Sea region.

While these rules ostensibly seek to protect individual privacy, they may also place an undue burden on organisations that rely on cross-border data transfers, ultimately raising the question: Are these regulations an overreach, or are they a critical safeguard in the digital age?

In this opinion piece, I argue that while the regulations represent an essential step in safeguarding personal data, they risk creating a restrictive environment that could stifle business growth and innovation. The real challenge lies in finding a balance that protects data rights without suffocating the dynamic business ecosystem Saudi Arabia is striving to build.

A Strong Stance on Data Sovereignty – But at What Cost?

Saudi Arabia’s Personal Data Protection Law (PDPL) and the recently amended Data Transfer Regulations emphasise data sovereignty, requiring stringent standards for international data transfers. While this is a noble pursuit, the reality is that these requirements are complicated and demanding, especially for businesses that rely on frequent data exchanges across borders.


The regulations require companies to conduct extensive risk assessments for transfers, secure approval for adequacy from foreign data jurisdictions, and implement complex contractual safeguards like Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs) and Binding Corporate Rules (BCRs). These requirements, although intended to protect data privacy, introduce a significant operational burden, particularly for SMEs, who may lack the resources to navigate the labyrinthine compliance framework.


One could argue that the cost of compliance may overshadow the intended benefits of these regulations, deterring smaller businesses from entering Saudi Arabia’s market and pushing foreign companies to think twice before establishing data operations here.

The Real Risks of Overregulation: A Barrier to Regional Innovation

Saudi Arabia’s approach to data sovereignty is not without its merits. In a digital world, where data security concerns are paramount, strong data protections are critical to maintaining public trust. However, the extent and rigidity of the current Data Transfer Regulations may ultimately lead to unintended consequences that hinder innovation.

Firstly, by focusing heavily on data localisation and transfer restrictions, Saudi Arabia risks isolating its digital economy. The Kingdom’s ambitious Vision 2030 blueprint envisions Saudi Arabia as a digital leader, but creating restrictive data transfer policies may undermine its competitiveness in the global market.

Large multinational companies often require seamless cross-border data flows to function effectively, and an inflexible stance on data transfer could prompt these companies to reconsider their investments or operations in Saudi Arabia.

Moreover, the impact on startups and SMEs is particularly concerning. Small businesses, often the backbone of innovation, are disproportionately affected by these stringent requirements. Faced with costly compliance obligations, they might opt to avoid the Saudi market entirely, which would be counterproductive to the Kingdom’s goal of fostering a dynamic, diverse economy.

Cross-Border Data Flow Controls – Necessary or Overzealous?

One of the key criticisms of Saudi Arabia’s data transfer rules is that they place excessive trust in legal mechanisms like SCCs and BCRs without providing simpler, more accessible alternatives for companies. In many ways, this regulatory approach assumes that all companies have the resources to secure expensive legal reviews and contractual adjustments, which is far from reality.

In Europe, for example, data transfer compliance is also stringent, but the European Union’s GDPR includes mechanisms like the adequacy framework, enabling smoother data flows to countries deemed to offer comparable levels of data protection. Saudi Arabia’s approach could benefit from a similar model. Offering additional, flexible compliance mechanisms could make the data transfer process more accessible while maintaining robust protections for personal data.

There is an opportunity for Saudi Arabia to establish itself as a model for privacy-compliant data transfer in the Red Sea region by developing frameworks that offer the necessary protections without deterring investment. By offering streamlined compliance pathways, Saudi Arabia could foster a privacy-centric yet business-friendly environment.

Balancing Data Sovereignty with Economic Growth – A Call for Flexibility

The SDAIA has the opportunity to create a regulatory environment that protects data privacy while supporting the Kingdom’s economic growth. One practical approach could be introducing tiered compliance obligations based on the size and resources of the organisation. Large, well-resourced multinational corporations could be required to adhere to more complex safeguards like SCCs and BCRs, while smaller entities might benefit from simpler, less resource-intensive mechanisms.

Further, regional harmonisation of data transfer standards within the Red Sea area could reduce the compliance burden on businesses that operate across borders. By working with neighbouring countries to align on data privacy standards, Saudi Arabia could establish a regional data privacy framework that enables smoother cross-border operations without compromising individual privacy rights.

Conclusion: Finding the Right Balance for a Thriving Digital Economy

Saudi Arabia’s Cross-Border Data Transfer Regulations reflect the Kingdom’s ambitious pursuit of data sovereignty and privacy protection, both of which are admirable goals. However, achieving these goals requires a nuanced approach. Overregulation risks creating an insular digital environment, pushing away the very businesses and startups that could drive innovation and economic growth in the Kingdom.

In my view, the SDAIA should consider revisiting the Data Transfer Regulations with a focus on flexibility and accessibility. By offering adaptable compliance pathways and exploring regional harmonisation, Saudi Arabia can create a balanced framework that safeguards privacy without stifling innovation. The Kingdom has an opportunity to lead the Red Sea region in data protection by setting a standard that values both data privacy and economic dynamism.

If Saudi Arabia strikes the right balance, it will be well-positioned to become a global leader in data protection without sacrificing the competitiveness and vibrancy of its digital economy.

Contact the author
Peter Borner
Executive Chairman and Chief Trust Officer

As Co-founder, Executive Chairman and Chief Trust Officer of The Data Privacy Group, Peter Borner leverages over 30 years of expertise to drive revenue for organisations by prioritising trust. Peter shapes tailored strategies to help businesses reap the rewards of increased customer loyalty, improved reputation, and, ultimately, higher revenue. His approach provides clients with ongoing peace of mind, solidifying their foundation in the realm of digital trust.

Specialises in: Privacy & Data Governance

Peter Borner
Executive Chairman and Chief Trust Officer

As Co-founder, Executive Chairman and Chief Trust Officer of The Data Privacy Group, Peter Borner leverages over 30 years of expertise to drive revenue for organisations by prioritising trust. Peter shapes tailored strategies to help businesses reap the rewards of increased customer loyalty, improved reputation, and, ultimately, higher revenue. His approach provides clients with ongoing peace of mind, solidifying their foundation in the realm of digital trust.

Specialises in: Privacy & Data Governance

Contact Our Team Today
Your confidential, no obligation discussion awaits.